Accounting theory and practice, Volume 2 (of 3) : a textbook for colleges and…

appropriated or trusts violated. It is necessary, therefore, to employ a term of more definite meaning which cannot be misused. The word “Customer” is sometimes used and is not objectionable. However, the term “Trade Debtors” is more generally employed and will be so used here as denoting all claims against customers, clients, etc., in regular course of business. Its appearance in a balance sheet is usually evidence of a careful discrimination among the various classes of claims and is not therefore a misleading term. Risk from Credit Losses As stated above, the chief problem in valuing accounts and notes receivable is that of estimating bad debts. It is a matter of general experience that some of those to whom credit is extended do not pay their bills. Hence, at the close of the fiscal period it is necessary, so as not to overstate the asset, to estimate the amount which probably cannot be collected. The necessity for this is recognized in a decision of the United States Supreme Court in Providence Rubber Co. v. Goodyear, 9 Wall. 788, and has the sanction of conservative business policy. The effect of such an estimate is that the period in which the sale is effected is made to stand the loss, and not the one in which failure to secure collection is experienced. There is a close relationship between the actual loss from bad debts and the credit policy of a concern. Where the sales force is allowed to grant credit, the loss from bad debts is almost invariably large. Where the extension of credit is controlled by a credit department, the loss is less than in the other case but depends on thoroughness of information and investigation of the risk. However much care may be exercised, there will be nevertheless some loss, but a live credit supervision should keep the loss at a minimum. Risk and Length of Credit Period The amount of loss, or rather the percentage of loss, is not the same for different lines of business nor even for different concerns in the same line. The normal credit period for a particular business has some relation to the loss. Thus if credit supervision and collection effort are the same for two concerns, the one with the shorter credit period will usually have the smaller loss. In a business, for example, where the credit term is 60 days, we would expect fewer uncollectible accounts than in one whose credit period extends for a year or more. As between two concerns in the same line of business, _where conditions are fairly uniform_, however, there should be little variation in the loss from bad debts. As pointed out in Volume I, Chapter XXXVI, the sales discount policy is for the most part a device for overcoming the element of risk in the extension of credit. Analysis of Customers’ Accounts as the Basis for Estimate of Bad Debts In estimating the amount of bad debts, experience within the particular business is the only safe guide. Oftentimes, however, the manager or proprietor is not the most competent person for the task. The auditor, in consultation with the manager, may often arrive at a better estimate than could someone closely connected with the business. In making the estimate, it is an aid to analyze the accounts according to the length of time they are past due. Thus, there would be, after analysis, the amount of those overdue not more than 30 days, the amount of those overdue not more than 60 days, the amount of the 60 to 90 days overdue items, those 90 days to six months, those six months to a year, and all those more than a year overdue. The total amount outstanding minus the sum of these overdue classes represents the portion not yet due. Some part of the not-yet-due portion is, of course, still subject to discount if paid within the discount term. With the claims against customers thus analyzed, a much better basis is afforded for testing the adequacy of the provision for bad debts. The various methods of estimating this provision are discussed on page 219. It may here be noted that when making up the estimate of bad debts it is by no means always necessary to analyze the outstanding items as suggested above. Such an analysis is of value in three cases: